Mabus Incarnate ~ View topic

Global Forum Moderator Joined: 28 Sep 2009 Posts: 409

Apparently the History channel is going to keep UFO Hunters.
This Thursday, starting at 8:00 PM they are going to run a marathon with what they promise are all new episodes.

Check it out!

http://www.history.com/schedule.do?action=daily&NetworkId=&start=1256860800000&end=1256866200000

Ya never can tell with the Boob Tube Executives, but perhaps this is a good thing.

Founder - Head Admin Joined: 08 Feb 2008 Posts: 4244

I heard about this and was well pleased. I signed the petition for this a while back and spread it everywhere. I hope this is the start of more to come and not the final farewell. Looking forward to this.

Global Forum Moderator Joined: 28 Sep 2009 Posts: 409

That makes two of us, VLT.

The show is awesome in its willingness to dig deep into the evidence.

Founder - Head Admin Joined: 08 Feb 2008 Posts: 4244

I hope the show continues to live part these episodes and history channel doesn't try to puss toot out again on us. That's what I hope my alien friends!

Member magna cum laude Joined: 02 Jun 2009 Posts: 254

Aren't they on the sci fi channel sometimes too?

From what I understand, they are going to air four previously unaired shows and that's going to conclude the series. This info was from a while ago, so hopefully things have changed.

well now that I have history and syfy again i can watch! I am excited hehehe

Member Joined: 12 Feb 2008 Posts: 126

I watch some of the last four episodes of UFO Hunters on History and discover out of the three researchers Bill and Pat hypotheses suffer the same pitfall as most â€œUFOlogistâ€ which is they are quick to assume an UFO is an ET craft even when the evidence doesnâ€™t support such of a hypothesis... What the UFO Hunters and others in the field of UFOlogy should be doing is attempting to see what incidences are UFOs and what are explainable aerial phenomenons. Once that is done the second step should be to determine if the aerial phenomenon is an artificial (manmade) or a natural occurring phenomenon... Unfortunately this is how far most UFO cases can go without starting to speculate about the UFO origins and most likely wouldnâ€™t make good television or movies... However, if the UFO Hunters manage to get a piece of the aerial phenomenon or capture one (i.e. orbs) then it would allow them to form a better hypothesis about that particular UFO incidence... It would serve the UFO Hunters and other ufologist well if they can even get evidence of interaction with an UFO... An example would be in the â€œDark Menaceâ€ episode when an orb liquidized those poor labs having samples would give forensics a chance explore what actually happen or better yet since they are only the size of a basketball try to physically capture one...
This is what I find the most frustrating aspect with the field of UFOlogy the lack of development of methodology to collect physical evidence when encounters of the fourth and fifth kind occur... Once a methodology is developed do PSA during coast to coast am and shows like UFO Hunters... Also what I find frustrating is how quickly ufologist declared â€œlightsâ€ in the sky as ET crafts... Like I stated 1,001 times only way you can have evidence of a craft is of extraterrestrial origin is if the craft or a piece of the craft is available for study and experimentation or if you are really lucky it occupants...

Global Forum Moderator Joined: 28 Sep 2009 Posts: 409

While I do agree that far too many so called investigators are quick yo jump the gun in their judgments, there has been cases of physical evidence gathered from time to time. Not just necessarily a piece of the craft is needed.

In one such case the craft left residue that was photographed as glowing, and left the area barren. Residue was taken for analysis and anything that couldn't be linked to any known substance was simply classified as "unknown."

In another case residue was left on a police officer's vehicle and examined with much the same results.

So there are times when physical evidence has been left by craft that defy anything we are capable of aerodynamically.

If craft are leaving physical evidence, doing things our technology currently labels as impossible, and are being seen by credible witnesses, I would say it is a fair assumption of logic that they are not from this planet to say the least.

Please understand that I am not belittling what you know. I am just assuming you may not have heard of these cases, and informing you to them.

I also agree, some investigators do leap to their conclusions way too quickly. I just don't think UFO hunters did so. They went into the investigations with high expectations, and they did bring along a skeptic to allow for natural explanations.

Good post, Bro. It brings up points that many people with an interest in paranormal phenomenon miss. Smile

Member Joined: 12 Feb 2008 Posts: 126

The problem is that even if residue is classified as â€œunknownâ€ doesnâ€™t establish the UFO as an ET craft, however if they tested the residue and discover that the isotopes arenâ€™t of terrestrial origin then there is some support for that particular UFO incident could have been of ET origin... As for â€œaerodynamically impossibleâ€ maneuvering that is difficult to determine by most UFO witnesses because they donâ€™t have a full understanding of what black projects there are being developed at the time or the true maneuvering of the object they were observing... It has been said many times our government is experimenting with craft 50-100 years beyond know technology... I am not trying to start an argument if any particular UFO incident was of ET origins or not but trying to make clear what it would take for the scientific community to accept a particular UFO=ET craft hypothesis... Basically if UFOlogy wants to be consider a science it has to be govern by the same rules that biology, cosmology, and the other sciences are govern by which is the scientific method...

Global Forum Moderator Joined: 28 Sep 2009 Posts: 409

No argument here, Mikey. I can understand your points, M'man. Very Happy

However it should be understood that such craft have been showing up, and recorded for thousands of years. That is way before the military has been working on anything, or even existed for that matter.

How could Roman historians remark about a "flying shield" in the sky a few thousand years before we had even invented the hot air balloon?

Why did Renaissance painters put classic UFO images in their paintings hundreds of years before the Wright Brothers?

They had no contact with our conception of "flying disks" but they faithfully described, and depicted them. You can not say our military did it all when it's been happening well before they existed.

There are just too many so called "coincidences" throughout history for it to simply be put off as advanced military aircraft.

Not to mention the tribe who claimed their ancestors came from Space, and suffered tons of ridicule for years, because the star they claimed to have originated from was just empty space. Not a single telescope on Earth could detect a single thing there...until they put up the Hubble. all of the sudden there was a star exactly where they said it would be...one they could not have possibly seen or known about from the surface of the Earth.

The reason I say "impossible" is the 90 degree turns at speeds that our best jets are incapable of, and by the testimony of trained military pilots who do understand the physics of aerodynamics quite well. I would say they know better than we do as to what is, or is not theoretically possible.

Mystery quest is Wednesday , history channel.